<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407</id><updated>2011-07-08T04:33:20.188-04:00</updated><category term='trend trading'/><category term='obama'/><category term='education'/><category term='general equilibrium'/><category term='economics'/><category term='skydeck'/><category term='chicago'/><category term='healthcare'/><category term='unemployment'/><category term='asset bubble'/><category term='underemployment'/><category term='warren buffett'/><category term='economy'/><category term='richard dennis'/><category term='goolsbee'/><category term='turtle trading'/><category term='CBOT'/><category term='debt'/><category term='long term'/><category term='debt cycle'/><category term='2008'/><category term='the ledge'/><title type='text'>Hot Economics</title><subtitle type='html'>Energy, Healthcare, Monetary Policy, And More</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>16</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-9043966463946356684</id><published>2010-08-12T18:00:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-08-12T18:00:05.789-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The States Grow Restless as an Empire Wanes</title><summary type='text'>
There is a long tradition in the United States of dissent among the States toward the Federal Government. The battle between State and Federal power has been constant since the birth of the nation. In the decades since World War II, however, it is quite clear that the balance of power has shifted decisively toward the Federal Government.

Lately, I've theorized that the nation as a whole would </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/9043966463946356684/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2010/08/states-grow-restless-as-empire-wanes.html#comment-form' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/9043966463946356684'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/9043966463946356684'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2010/08/states-grow-restless-as-empire-wanes.html' title='The States Grow Restless as an Empire Wanes'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_tAGL1rnWRm0/TGRuGwwfi8I/AAAAAAAAABU/0XRMsJ0-vMY/s72-c/Picture+49.png' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-1892439245275513173</id><published>2010-06-24T17:30:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-06-24T17:30:17.373-04:00</updated><title type='text'>European Debt Crisis: A Comprehensive Analysis</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--StartFragment--&gt;  
Introduction
I have to confess that when I first heard of the European debt crisis I was overcome with joy. This was for three reasons. First, I demonstrated that the European Monetary Union was, collectively, in a much more precarious fiscal condition than the United States in a class I had at Rollins in the spring of 2009 where the teacher openly mocked me for suggesting </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/1892439245275513173/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2010/06/european-debt-crisis-comprehensive_24.html#comment-form' title='17 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/1892439245275513173'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/1892439245275513173'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2010/06/european-debt-crisis-comprehensive_24.html' title='European Debt Crisis: A Comprehensive Analysis'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>17</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-6325695890408703471</id><published>2010-06-24T17:28:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2010-06-24T17:28:20.272-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The European Debt Crisis: A Comprehensive Analysis</title><summary type='text'> &lt;!--StartFragment--&gt;  
Introduction
I have to confess that when I first heard of the European debt crisis I was overcome with joy. This was for three reasons. First, I demonstrated that the European Monetary Union was, collectively, in a much more precarious fiscal condition than the United States in a class I had at Rollins in the spring of 2009 where the teacher openly mocked me for suggesting</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/6325695890408703471/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2010/06/european-debt-crisis-comprehensive.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/6325695890408703471'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/6325695890408703471'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2010/06/european-debt-crisis-comprehensive.html' title='The European Debt Crisis: A Comprehensive Analysis'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-8717473095040641432</id><published>2009-09-27T00:40:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-27T00:41:29.112-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Energy As Currency: Cat Is Out Of The bag.</title><summary type='text'>

What follows is a response of mine to an article that I'm about to post over on one of my favorite blogs, The Oil Drum . I posted my response here, first, simply to ensure that I'm credited with my own work (indeed, I have an enormous amount of work into this idea). The time stamps should evidence that what follow is my post, my idea, and, incidentally, reveal my identity on the blogosphere as </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/8717473095040641432/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/energy-as-currency-cat-is-out-of-bag.html#comment-form' title='17 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/8717473095040641432'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/8717473095040641432'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/energy-as-currency-cat-is-out-of-bag.html' title='Energy As Currency: Cat Is Out Of The bag.'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>17</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-6985450878275260135</id><published>2009-09-24T17:19:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-24T17:19:24.412-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Food for Thought: Unemployment Irony</title><summary type='text'>I think it is safe to say that just about everyone sees unemployment as a bad thing. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that unemployment is actually a good thing and that it is a sign of progress.

Consider the case of yourself being stranded alone on an island. In order to survive, you must perform quite a bit of work: you have to gather fresh water, gather food, gather firewood, cook </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/6985450878275260135/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/food-for-thought-unemployment-irony.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/6985450878275260135'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/6985450878275260135'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/food-for-thought-unemployment-irony.html' title='Food for Thought: Unemployment Irony'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-4650449212822699787</id><published>2009-09-20T00:01:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-20T00:01:38.051-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Who Loses? Who Wins?</title><summary type='text'>I had an interesting conversation today with a fellow academic about the U.S./China dynamic. It went like this:

Friend: We (the U.S.) are regulating ourselves into poverty with all of these environmental restrictions
Me: Really? How? 
Friend: First we can't use DDT, we lose all of our citrus to South America, then we have water quality regulations and we lose all of our manufacturing to China. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/4650449212822699787/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/who-loses-who-wins.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/4650449212822699787'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/4650449212822699787'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/who-loses-who-wins.html' title='Who Loses? Who Wins?'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-4425071338678580734</id><published>2009-09-15T01:17:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-15T01:17:30.248-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Personal Note: Qualifying My Attack On The Left</title><summary type='text'>I just thought I'd fill my readers in on something: I'm a huge fan of the free market system. Throughout my blog, I'll frequently attack the left (almost exclusively) for their attacks on the market system. I should qualify and explain these attacks:

I believe (though I cannot yet prove)

that the market is the way of nature
that a market system is the most efficient economic system obtainable </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/4425071338678580734/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/personal-note-qualifying-my-attack-on.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/4425071338678580734'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/4425071338678580734'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/personal-note-qualifying-my-attack-on.html' title='Personal Note: Qualifying My Attack On The Left'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-2459674923668428521</id><published>2009-09-14T10:38:00.055-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-15T00:26:29.388-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Economic Theory: Efficient Markets, Leverage, and Rational Market Participants</title><summary type='text'>It seems that it is in vogue to question the fundamentals of market economies these days. Understandable. While driving back from breakfast this morning, I was listening to Marc Faber being interviewed by Tom Keene on Bloomberg. They were discussing the idea of leverage in efficient markets with the innuendo being that efficient markets shouldn't need leverage (Faber flatly denied this saying, </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/2459674923668428521/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/economic-theory-efficient-markets.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/2459674923668428521'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/2459674923668428521'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/economic-theory-efficient-markets.html' title='Economic Theory: Efficient Markets, Leverage, and Rational Market Participants'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-4835079026144465900</id><published>2009-09-11T00:24:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-11T00:24:25.495-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Markets and Information: Left vs. Right</title><summary type='text'>Sorry this post was a little late today but I guess better late than never. Unless we're talking about delivering anti-venom. Then never is probably better because if the anti-venom arrived too late it would be like "hey, you could have lived if it wasn't for that red light" and it would be the worst tease ever. Anywho....

One of my classes today (Income and Wealth Distribution) focused on </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/4835079026144465900/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/markets-and-information-left-vs-right.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/4835079026144465900'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/4835079026144465900'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/markets-and-information-left-vs-right.html' title='Markets and Information: Left vs. Right'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-6639122544173377914</id><published>2009-09-09T14:29:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-09T17:47:29.969-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='asset bubble'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='debt cycle'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='debt'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='2008'/><title type='text'>The Debt Cycle: Loan Duration and Credit Crisis</title><summary type='text'>I'll be honest. I'm pretty proud of this one. After flipping through all of my economics books and numerous google searches I can confidently say that I've devised an original visual representation of debt in the business cycle. If any of my readers have seen such a representation elsewhere, feel free to burst my bubble in the comments section.

What prompted this maddening exercise in MS Paint </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/6639122544173377914/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/debt-cycle-loan-duration-and-credit.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/6639122544173377914'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/6639122544173377914'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/debt-cycle-loan-duration-and-credit.html' title='The Debt Cycle: Loan Duration and Credit Crisis'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_tAGL1rnWRm0/SqfohHooq9I/AAAAAAAAAAg/YFSe-7SwJzk/s72-c/Debt+Cycle.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-449923116358273935</id><published>2009-09-08T13:29:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-08T13:29:06.370-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Dollar: Up Or Down?</title><summary type='text'>This is going to be a quick post.

The value of any currency moves with changes in the relationship between productive capacity and currency supply. Faith plays a huge role but, for simplicity, we'll do away with faith here. Many pundits have been calling for the dollar to crash citing the large monetary expansion undertaken by the Federal Reserve in an attempt to combat the recession/depression.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/449923116358273935/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/dollar-up-or-down.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/449923116358273935'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/449923116358273935'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/dollar-up-or-down.html' title='The Dollar: Up Or Down?'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-8024286409763150164</id><published>2009-09-06T22:13:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-06T22:13:47.858-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='long term'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='goolsbee'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='economics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='richard dennis'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='education'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='turtle trading'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CBOT'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='warren buffett'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='trend trading'/><title type='text'>Long Term Solution: Education as a Market Force 1.0</title><summary type='text'>Economics is unique in comparison to the other sciences in that the way we observe the world has a very large impact on how the world actually works. If an astronomer improperly observes the movement of stars it doesn't actually change the way those stars move. If a physicist theorizes some physical constant, it doesn't alter whether or not that constant exists or what the metrics of that </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/8024286409763150164/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/long-term-solution-education-as-market.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/8024286409763150164'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/8024286409763150164'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/long-term-solution-education-as-market.html' title='Long Term Solution: Education as a Market Force 1.0'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-1796741839236936185</id><published>2009-09-06T10:41:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-06T10:41:56.716-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Currency: An Alternate View to a Collapse</title><summary type='text'>The Chinese have approximately $2,000,000,000,000 (that's trillion) in foreign exchange reserves. About half of that is held in U.S. government bonds with the remainder held in other currencies (euros, rubbles, etc.). The popular theory goes that China cannot afford either the default or a significant weakening of the U.S. dollar as it would batter it's own currency, the renminbi, and the savings</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/1796741839236936185/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/currency-alternate-view-to-collapse.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/1796741839236936185'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/1796741839236936185'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/currency-alternate-view-to-collapse.html' title='Currency: An Alternate View to a Collapse'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-9144244669615391834</id><published>2009-09-05T11:34:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-05T11:34:00.699-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='unemployment'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='underemployment'/><title type='text'>Unemployment: We Don't Need You Anymore</title><summary type='text'>The goal of this post is to investigate the necessary employment of the United States. That is to say, the number of people that actually have to work in order for all of us to survive. For the sake of this post, survival will constitute the availability of food, water, shelter, and energy. My methods are a bit shady but will suffice for a quick post and to convey my message: we really don't need</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/9144244669615391834/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/unemployment-we-dont-need-you-anymore.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/9144244669615391834'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/9144244669615391834'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/unemployment-we-dont-need-you-anymore.html' title='Unemployment: We Don&apos;t Need You Anymore'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-6039852402865002289</id><published>2009-09-04T23:40:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-04T23:40:22.432-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='healthcare'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='general equilibrium'/><title type='text'>Healthcare: Whatever Happened to General Equilibrium?</title><summary type='text'>Economists seem to love general equilibrium. For those non-technocrats, general equilibrium is the state sought by the forces of supply and demand. General equilibrium tells us that doctors, and health-care services in general, command such a high price because (1.) they are in short supply relative to demand and/or (2.) their price is commensurate to the amount they have invested in developing </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/6039852402865002289/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/healthcare-whatever-happened-to-general.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/6039852402865002289'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/6039852402865002289'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/healthcare-whatever-happened-to-general.html' title='Healthcare: Whatever Happened to General Equilibrium?'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5074134713215565407.post-1831495663152045889</id><published>2009-09-04T23:28:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-04T23:30:57.514-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='the ledge'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='economics'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='chicago'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='skydeck'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='economy'/><title type='text'>"Please allow me to introduce myself...</title><summary type='text'>
My name is Cornelius X. Carroll. That's me, on the left, laying on a sheet of glass cantilevered off the side of the Sear's Tower. I'm a senior at Rollins College and am an economics major. I'm originally from Chicago and hope to return there to attend graduate school at The University of Chicago. For as long as I can remember, I've been exposed to economic ideas through contact with my family </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/1831495663152045889/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/please-allow-me-to-introduce-myself.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/1831495663152045889'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5074134713215565407/posts/default/1831495663152045889'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://hoteconomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/please-allow-me-to-introduce-myself.html' title='&quot;Please allow me to introduce myself...'/><author><name>Cornelius</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04600858698569831914</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_tAGL1rnWRm0/SqHTfU5Np1I/AAAAAAAAAAY/KcbW4D5luuM/s72-c/Laying+on+glass.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
